SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 16:29-33 (1952)
© 1952 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Englehorn, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Woodruff, N. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Englehorn, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Woodruff, N. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Englehorn, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Woodruff, N. P.

The Effects of Plant Residue Cover and Clod Structure on Soil Losses by Wind1

C. L. Englehorn, A. W. Zingg and N. P. Woodruff2

ABSTRACT

Tests were conducted in the field to determine the interrelationships of surface drag, surface roughness, plant residue cover, percent of soil material less than 0.42 mm in diameter, and soil loss obtained by means of a portable wind tunnel. The tests were conducted at Garden City, Colby, and Manhattan, Kans. on plots prepared especially to obtain a range in residue cover over a range in soil structure.

The data obtained were analyzed according to standard multiple regression and correlation procedure and presented in terms of regression equations. The exponential regression equations provided a satisfactory expression of the functional relationships. Factors effecting variation in results between the different locations were cited.

The regression equations illustrate the effect of each factor on soil loss. On the basis of relationships secured at three locations, an exponential equation approximating the results of the tests as a whole was developed. In this equation, soil loss, X, in pounds per acre is shown to vary directly as the 2.5 power of the surface drag of the wind and the 3.5 power of the percent of soil fractions less than 0.42 mm in diameter. It varied inversely as the 0.8 power of the weight of surface residue. A simplified clod structure-residue index of soil loss, wherein the surface drag of the wind is held constant at 3,000 pounds per acre, is presented.


NOTES

1 Contribution 448, Department of Agronomy, Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Manhattan, Kans., and the Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A. Cooperative investigations in the mechanics of wind erosion.

2 Soil Scientist, Project Supervisor, and Agricultural Engineer, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A., respectively.

Grateful acknowledgment is made to personnel of the Kansas branch agricultural experiment stations for the use of equipment and assistance given in carrying out the tests.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1952 by the Soil Science Society of America.