SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 17:165-170 (1953)
© 1953 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Free, G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Free, G. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Free, G. R.

Stubble-Mulch Tillage in New York1

George R. Free2

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this paper is to report on progress made in adapting stubble-mulch tillage for use under the cool, humid conditions of New York State. Comparisons of stubble-mulch plowing and disking with turn plowing over a period of 7 years in New York State have been presented and discussed. Over most of the period, and for all crops studied except hay, both kinds of stubble-mulch tillage resulted in significantly lower yields than those resulting from turn plowing. During the last year of the comparison, however, an improved technique of stubble-mulch plowing using an improvised plow operating on the tandem and double-cut principle gave results fully as satisfactory as turn plowing. Soil penetrometer and moisture data showed that the new stubble-mulch plowing technique produced a seedbed as loose as that obtained by turn plowing and also resulted in moisture conservation through concentration of crop residues on the surface. At the same time, there were indications that disking resulted in a seedbed more difficult to penetrate with the penetrometer and also one from which moisture was used inefficiently for crop production and lost by excessive evaporation regardless of the presence of a residue mulch.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Division of Research, Soil Conservation Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, in cooperation with Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station. Presented before Section VI, Soil Science Society of America, State College, Pa., August, 1951. Copy received for publication after approximately 1-year's loss in mail.

2 Soil Conservationist.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1953 by the Soil Science Society of America.