SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 20:328-333 (1956)
© 1956 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Veal, N. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Veal, N. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Veal, N. C.

Flame Photometric Determination of Exchangeable Calcium and Magnesium in Soils1

W. M. Shaw and N. Claire Veal2

ABSTRACT

The Beckman Model DU spectrophotometer, with No. 9200 flame attachment, and No. 4300 photomultiplier assembly was used to determine exchangeable Ca and Mg in soils. The study involved an investigation of the instrumental adjustments that would give the highest metal-to-background emission ratio, including effect of flame composition. The effects of Al, Fe, Mn, and PO4 upon Ca and Mg flame emissions were investigated. Thirty-two soils were analyzed chemically, and by 2 flame photometric procedures for Ca and Mg, with special emphasis on the effects of method of extraction and preparation of test solution. Two procedures for photometric determinations of exchangeable Ca and Mg are proposed:

1. A "standard procedure" which calls for the elimination of the acetate ion and the removal of R2O3 and PO4, and a resultant test solution of 0.2 N NH4Cl;
2. A simpler "optional procedure" which consists of the direct flame photometric reading of the soil NH4OAc extract.

In the photometric determination of Ca and Mg in NH4OAc solution, the greatest source of error stemmed from the mutual interferences of the two cations, the Ca imparting a slight plus error to the Mg, and the Mg imparting a minus error to the Ca. No such interferences were observed when the determinations were made in the solution of 0.2 N NH4Cl. For soils low in exchangeable Ca and Mg, it is suggested that the exchangeable Ca and Mg may be equally well determined by the simpler "optional procedure". However, for soils of high Ca and/or Mg contents or where phosphate is suspected, the use of the "standard procedure" is recommended.


NOTES

1 Received Oct. 18, 1954.

2 Associate Soil Chemist and former Assistant Chemist, respectively, University of Tennessee Agr. Exp. Sta., Knoxville. The authors wish to express their appreciation to Dr. John Dean for aid in instrumental adjustment.

Received for publication October 18, 1954.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1956 by the Soil Science Society of America.