SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 20:375-378 (1956)
© 1956 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Terman, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Seatz, L. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Terman, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Seatz, L. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Terman, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Seatz, L. F.

Crop Response to Metaphosphate Fertilizers1

G. L. Terman and L. F. Seatz2

ABSTRACT

Results of tests with metaphosphate fertilizers were summarized for the 1936–54 period. These included 1,092 tests with calcium metaphosphate (CMP) and 175 tests with potassium metaphosphate (KMP) on acid to neutral soils, and 82 tests with CMP on alkaline soils. Only results of tests were included in which a significant yield response to phosphorus was obtained. On acid to neutral soils, CMP compared favorably with concentrated superphosphate (CSP) on corn, small grain, forage, cotton, and tobacco crops but was slightly inferior on potato and vegetable crops. KMP was also an excellent source of phosphorus for corn, cotton, small grain, and forage crops. Liming acid soils had the same effect in increasing yields with CMP as with CSP. There was no appreciable advantage from the standpoint of crop production in grinding CMP finer than to pass a 10-mesh screen. CMP was, in general, a satisfactory source of phosphorus for alfalfa and other hay grown on calcareous soils but was usually poorer than CSP for potatoes, sugar beets, and spring-sown small grain.


NOTES

1 The data reported in this paper were obtained largely from reports submitted to T.V.A. by 31 state agricultural experiment stations listed in tables 1 and 4. Most of the data were obtained by Alabama, Colorado, Georgia, Iowa, Kentucky, Mississippi, New York, North Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and Washington stations, with whom T.V.A. has contractual fertilizer research projects.

2 Agronomist and former Assistant Chief, respectively, Soils and Fertilizer Research Branch, Division of Agricultural Relations, T.V.A.

Received for publication July 11, 1955.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1956 by the Soil Science Society of America.