SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 21:392-396 (1957)
© 1957 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eno, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Blue, W. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Eno, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Blue, W. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Eno, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Blue, W. G.

The Comparative Rate of Nitrification of Anhydrous Ammonia, Urea, and Ammonium Sulfate in Sandy Soils1

Charles F. Eno and William G. Blue2

ABSTRACT

Three acid sandy soils, Arredondo, Leon, and Klej fine sands, were used in comparing the rates of nitrification for anhydrous ammonia, urea, and ammonium sulfate in the laboratory. Anhydrous ammonia stimulated the nitrification process more than equivalent applications of ammonium sulfate in limed and unlimed soil. The stimulating effect of urea was of the same general order as anhydrous ammonia. Anhydrous ammonia applied to the soil raises the pH into a more nearly optimum range for nitrification and initially provides a base for the neutralization of the nitric acid produced. This process can be effective only so long as high concentrations of ammonia are present in the soil; in these soils, which nitrified at low rates, this period of time was long enough to initiate a good rate of nitrification. The stimulating effect may also occur with field applications of anhydrous ammonia, since an adequate concentration of ammonia is retained in a relatively small volume of soil. The stimulation of nitrification by anhydrous ammonia has not been definitely shown under field conditions; this has probably been due to failure to properly delineate the retention zone into a central core where ammoniacal nitrogen was high enough to be initially toxic to the nitrifiers and an optimum zone between the toxic concentration and that in untreated soil.


NOTES

1 Florida Agr. Exp. Sta. Journal Series No. 588. Presented before Div. III, Soil Science Society of America, Nov. 14, 1956, Cincinnati, Ohio.

2 Associate Soil Microbiologist and Associate Biochemist, respectively, Soils Department, Agr. Exp. Sta., University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

Received for publication December 29, 1956. Accepted for publication April 17, 1957.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1957 by the Soil Science Society of America.