SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 23:466-469 (1959)
© 1959 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCants, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Woltz, W. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McCants, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Woltz, W. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by McCants, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Woltz, W. G.

Influence of Certain Soil Fumigation Treatments on the Response of Tobacco to Ammonium and Nitrate Forms of Nitrogen1

C. B. McCants, E. O. Skogley and W. G. Woltz2

ABSTRACT

Fertilizer mixtures in which the nitrogen was allammonium, all-nitrate or equal parts ammonium and nitrate were applied in conjunction with the following soil fumigation treatments: not-fumigated, Dowfume W-85 (ethylene dibromide), Shell DD (dichloropropene and dichloropropane), and methyl bromide. Data were obtained on the effect of fumigation and N treatments on (1) the relative levels of ammonium and nitrate N in the soil during the growing season, (2) the ammonium and halogen content in the tobacco leaf at certain stages of growth, and (3) the yield and certain properties of the cured tobacco leaf.

Methyl bromide and Shell DD reduced nitrification to a greater degree than did Dowfume W-85. Three weeks after transplanting, the ammonium N and halogen contents in tobacco leaves from the ammonium N treatment were higher than from the nitrate N treatment on soil fumigated with Shell DD or methyl bromide, but no different for the Dowfume W-85 or not-fumigated treatments.

The yield and quality index of tobacco from the Shell DD and methyl bromide fumigation treatments increased with increasing percentage of the total N applied in the nitrate form. With Dowfume W-85, the highest yield was from the mixture of ammonium and nitrate N. There were no differences in yield or quality among N treatments on soil not-fumigated. For all fumigation treatments, the percentage N and percentage nicotine in the cured leaf were higher where ammonium N than where nitrate N was applied.


NOTES

1 Contribution from Department of Soils, North Carolina Agr. Exp. Sta., Raleigh. Published with approval of the Director as paper No. 992 of the Journal Series. Presented before Div. IV, Soil Science Society of America, Aug. 8, 1958, at Lafayette, Ind.

2 Associate Professor, Instructor, and Professor, respectively.

Received for publication January 26, 1959. Accepted for publication April 28, 1959.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1959 by the Soil Science Society of America.