SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 27:309-312 (1963)
© 1963 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Allison, F. E.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Allison, F. E.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, R. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Allison, F. E.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, R. M.

Comparative Rates of Decomposition in Soil of Wood and Bark Particles of Several Species of Pines1

F. E. Allison and R. M. Murphy2

ABSTRACT

The finely-ground woods and barks of 9 species of pine were allowed to decompose in soils in the presence and absence of additional nitrogen for periods of 63 to 800 days. Carbon dioxide evolution was measured at frequent intervals. The pine species studied were white, shortleaf, loblolly, slash, longleaf, ponderosa, western white, lodgepole, and sugar. An average of 16.2% of the wood carbon was oxidized in 60 days in the absence of extra nitrogen and 16.9% in its presence. The corresponding values for the barks were 8.7 and 8.6. The wood species showed variations in CO2 evolution during the 60-day period, ranging from 8% for sugar pine to 51% for shortleaf pine. The variations for the barks were between 3.0% for white pine and 23.3% for lodgepole pine. Most of the pine woods decomposed somewhat more rapidly than did the other softwoods previously studied, but not nearly so rapidly as did the hardwoods. The pine barks are oxidized at about the same slow rate as are the other softwood barks.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the U. S. Soils Laboratory, Soil and Water Conservation Research Division, ARS, USDA, Beltsville, Md.

2 Soil Scientists.

Received for publication June 19, 1962. Accepted for publication July 19, 1962.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1963 by the Soil Science Society of America.