SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 27:455-460 (1963)
© 1963 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dreibelbis, F. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dreibelbis, F. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dreibelbis, F. R.

Land Use and Soil Type Effects on the Soil Moisture Regimen in Lysimeters and Small Watersheds1

F. R. Dreibelbis2

ABSTRACT

Agronomic practices had a pronounced effect on both the rate and amount of extraction of moisture as determined by studies on the soil moisture regimen in lysimeters and small watersheds. These effects influenced water storage opportunity in the soil profile with its possible influence on infiltration, surface runoff, and percolation. For a second-year meadow in 1960, evapotranspiration from a 72-inch profile amounted to 19.06 and 14.40 inches on improved and prevailing practice, respectively. For corn in 1961, the values on the same areas were 19.81 and 17.90 inches, respectively.

Soil type effects on the moisture regimes were more noticeable in extraction patterns with depth than in the overall water budget. Evapotranspiration from a 72-inch profile in meadow amounted to 19.06 and 19.37 inches on the Keene and Muskingum soils, respectively. The following year (1961) the values in corn were 19.81 and 18.57 on the same areas, respectively.

Both rates and amounts of moisture extraction from a woodland watershed were much greater during the summer and early fall than from pasture. The water needed to recharge the 0- to 72-inch profile to field capacity at the end of the growing season amounted to 6.49 and 5.16 inches on the woodland and pasture watersheds, respectively. Accretion during late fall and winter contributed to water storage so that moisture values on both areas approached equality by spring.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Cornbelt Branch, Soil and Water Conservation Research Division, ARS, USDA, Coshocton, Ohio, in cooperation with the Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta., Wooster.

2 Research Soil Scientist. Grateful acknowledgment is made of the assistance of R. E. Youker, D. B. Wall, and W. W. Bentz in the collection and tabulation of the basic data.

Received for publication August 27, 1962. Accepted for publication October 4, 1962.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1963 by the Soil Science Society of America.