SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 28:5-8 (1964)
© 1964 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richards, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Decker, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Richards, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Decker, D. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Richards, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Decker, D. L.

Pressure Dependence of the Relative Vapor Pressure of Water in Soil1

L. A. Richards2, P. F. Low3 and D. L. Decker2

ABSTRACT

The equation {partial} ln (p/po)/{partial}P = (v – vo)/RT, expressing pressure dependence of the relative vapor pressure in terms of the difference between the partial molar volume v of the water in the system and the molar volume of pure water vo, was derived and was used in interpreting the experiments. A thermocouple psychrometer (TP) was calibrated at 25°C. using 0.10 and 0.20 molal KCl solutions at several air pressures in the sample chamber, ranging up to 15 bar. The TP reading for a sample of soil, when referred to the measurement for an appropriate sample of KCl solution, did not change significantly as the air pressure in the soil chamber was increased by 5-bar steps up to 15 bar. The total suction of water in soil is directly related to the relative vapor pressure p/po of the soil water and for our test sample the total suction was 6.44 bar at atmospheric pressure. The values of the standard deviation of total suction corresponding to the standard deviation of the TP readings were calculated to be 0.053, 0.084, and 0.109 bar for pressure increases of 5, 10, and 15 bar. Decreases in total suction greater than these amounts were not found.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the U. S. Salinity Laboratory, Soil and Water Conserv. Res. Div., ARS, USDA, Riverside, Calif. This work was supported in part by the Meteorology Department, U. S. Army Electronics Research & Development Activity.

2 Physicists, U. S. Salinity Laboratory, Riverside, Calif.

3 Professor, Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, Lafayette, Ind. Formerly Soil Scientist Consultant to U. S. Salinity Laboratory.

Received for publication April 5, 1963. Accepted for publication May 16, 1963.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1964 by the Soil Science Society of America.