|
|
||||||||
ABSTRACT
Methods for evaluating water contents and bulk densities of several different peats are compared. Because bulk densities (saturated volume basis) of moss, herbaceous, and aggregated peats varied from 0.028 to 0.249 g. per cc., a highly distorted impression of the amount of water actually held under field conditions is given if water values are expressed on an oven-dry weight basis.
On a wet-volume basis, moss peat held only 10 to 20% more water at saturation than did herbaceous and aggregated peat and retained less water than they did at higher suctions. Between 0.1 and 15 bars, moss peat retained about one-quarter the volume of water of a medium-textured mineral soil, Barnes loam.
Since considerable volume reduction occurs on drying, bulk density of oven-dry peat, Db (dry volume basis), represents an artificial condition rarely, if ever, occurring in undrained bogs. Bulk densities must, therefore, be calculated on the basis of the wet bulk volume and are referred to as Db (wet bulk volume). A more precise expression of degree of wetness may be substituted for "wet" in the wet volume basis term.
1 Contribution from the Lake States Forest Experiment Station, Forest Service, USDA, St. Paul, Minn., and the University of Minnesota Agr. Exp. Sta. (Scientific Journal Series No. 5134). Presented before Div. V-A, Soil Science Society of America, Aug. 21, 1962, at Ithaca, N.Y.
2 Respectively, Soil Scientist, Lake States Forest Exp. Sta.; and Professor of Soil Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minn.
Received for publication June 17, 1963. Accepted for publication September 18, 1963.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Vadose Zone Journal | Journal of Plant Registrations | ||||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Journal of Environmental Quality |
||||