SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 28:533-535 (1964)
© 1964 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eno, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Popenoe, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Eno, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Popenoe, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Eno, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Popenoe, H.

Gamma Radiation Compared with Steam and Methyl Bromide as a Soil Sterilizing Agent1

Charles F. Eno and Hugh Popenoe2

ABSTRACT

Red Bay loamy fine sand and Everglades muck were sterilized with gamma radiation, steam, and methyl bromide. Exchangeable NH4+; extractable N, P, and S; moisture equivalent; cation-exchange capacity; and organic matter were measured. None of the sterilization treatments significantly altered cation-exchange capacity. Steam significantly increased the amounts of N, P, and S extracted and the organic matter content values, compared to the check and the other two soil treatments; it also significantly decreased the moisture equivalent percentage. Gamma ray and methyl bromide sterilization generally increased the release of N, P, and S above the check. There was also a strong indication, based on the N data, that sterilization by gamma rays disrupted the soil organic materials more than methyl bromide. Finally, the intensity of all these factors is most closely associated with the organic matter content of the soil. Therefore, a sand, for example, would not be altered nearly as much as a loam or an organic soil.


NOTES

1 Fla. Agr. Exp. Sta. Journal Series 1791. Presented before Div. S-3, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Nov. 19, 1963, at Denver, Colo. The authors wish to express their appreciation to the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission for supporting this work in part.

2 Soil Microbiologist and Assistant Professor of Soils, respectively.

Received for publication November 14, 1963. Accepted for publication December 17, 1963.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1964 by the Soil Science Society of America.