SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 28:653-656 (1964)
© 1964 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keeney, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bremner, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Keeney, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bremner, J. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Keeney, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bremner, J. M.

Effect of Cultivation on the Nitrogen Distribution in Soils1

D. R. Keeney and J. M. Bremner2

ABSTRACT

The effect of cultivation on the nitrogen distribution in soils was studied by determining total N, nonexchangeable ammonium N, nonhydrolyzable N, and hydrolyzable (total, ammonium, hexosamine, amino acid, unidentified) N in 10 virgin soils and their cultivated analogues.

Cultivation led to a marked decrease in all forms of N, excepting nonexchangeable ammonium N, but, on the average, had little effect on the percentage distribution of N. The average percent loss of total N on cultivation was 36.2%, and the average losses of different forms of N, calculated as percentages of the loss in total N, decreased in the order: hydrolyzable N (70.5%) > amino acid N (29.8%) > nonhdrolyzable N (29.5%) > unidentified hydrolyzable N (20.0%) > hydrolyzable ammonium N (17.1%) > hexosamine N (3.5%) > nonexchangeable ammonium N (0.5%).

On the average, cultivation led to small increases in the proportions of total N as nonexchangeable ammonium N, Hydrolyzable N, hexosamine N, and hydrolyzable ammonium N, and to small decreases in the proportions as nonhydrolyzable N, amino acid N, and unidentified hydrolyzable N. The average percent losses of different forms of N on cultivation decreased in the order: amino acid N (43.0%) > nonhydrolyzable N (39.4%) > total N (36.2%) > total hydrolyzable N (35.2%) > unidentified hydrolyzable N (34.5%) > hydrolyzable ammonium N (28.6%) > hexosamine N (27.6%) > nonexchangeable ammonium N (0.2%).


NOTES

1 Journal Paper No. J-4819 of the Iowa Agr. and Home Econ. Exp. Sta., Ames. Project No. 1450.

2 Research Associate and Professor in Soils, respectively.

Received for publication March 14, 1964. Accepted for publication April 27, 1964.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1964 by the Soil Science Society of America.