SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 3:230-233 (1939)
© 1939 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Daniel, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Harper, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Daniel, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Harper, H. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Daniel, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Harper, H. J.

Nitrate Nitrogen Content of Rain and Runoff Water from Plots under Different Cropping Systems on Soil Classified as Vernon Fine Sandy Loam1

Harley A. Daniel, Harry M. Elwell and Horace J. Harper2

ABSTRACT

Runoff water and soil losses from plots under different controlled cropping systems were collected from 1930 to 1937, inclusive, at the Soil Conservation Experiment Station at Guthrie, Oklahoma. Aliquots of runoff water and rainfall were collected and analyzed for nitrate nitrogen.

The largest quantity of nitrate nitrogen appearing in the rain water during any season was 1.530 pounds per acre and the lowest 0.403, while the average was 0.976 pounds per acre. The smallest quantity of nitrates occurred during the driest year. The amount of nitrates found annually in the rain is considerably greater than that removed in the runoff from all plots except the desurfaced area. These results show that nitrate nitrogen is not removed from the surface of this soil in large amounts by erosion.

The quantity of nitrate nitrogen removed in water from the controlled plots was closely related to the percentage of runoff where the surface soil was studied. The results obtained from these plots show that other factors such as a desirable rotation, vegetative cover, and water conservation methods which increase the absorption of rainfall by soil, are essential in reducing nitrate nitrogen losses in runoff to a minimum.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Soil Conservation Service and the Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station.

2 Superintendent and Assistant Soil Conservationist, Soil Conservation Experiment Station, Guthrie, Oklahoma, and Professor of Soils, Oklahoma A. and M. College, Stillwater, Oklahoma, respectively. The authors wish to express their appreciation to the late S. W. Phillips for installing the experiment, and to Ira T. Goddard, H. G. Lewis, John W. Slosser and W. G. Kincannon for collecting a large portion of the water samples.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1939 by the Soil Science Society of America.