SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 30:163-167 (1966)
© 1966 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Voorhees, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Larson, W. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Voorhees, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Larson, W. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Voorhees, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Larson, W. E.

Porosity of Surface Soil Aggregates at Various Moisture Contents1

W. B. Voorhees, R. R. Allmaras and W. E. Larson2,3,

ABSTRACT

Porosity of individual surface soil aggregates at moisture contents ranging from saturation to air-dry was determined by glass bead displacement. Measurements were made on aggregates having a diameter range from 0.5 to 10 mm at air-dry moisture content and 2.0 to 10 mm at suctions ≤ 15 bars. The coefficient of variation for a determination of aggregate density (g cm-3) ranged from 1 to 11% depending on diameter and moisture content. The major contributor to precision loss was heterogeneity of soil aggregates and not precision errors of the method.

More than a 50% decrease in specific total pore volume (cm3 g-1 of oven-dry aggregate) upon desorption from saturation to air-dry was found for three aggregate sizes each from a Chernozem and a Chestnut soil. In both soils, the percentage of pores having diameters > 29 µ increased as aggregate diameter increased. The volume fraction of air at a given moisture content increased as the diameter of aggregate increased. For all aggregate sizes, the volume fraction of air was ≥ 0.10 at 0.33 bar suction. The two soils exhibited different types of shrinkage curves.

NOTES

1 Contribution from the Corn Belt Branch, Soil and Water Conservation Research Division, ARS, USDA, in cooperation with the Minnesota Agr. Exp. Sta. Presented at a joint meeting of Div. S-1 and S-6, Soil Science Society of America, Kansas City, Mo., Nov. 15–19, 1964.

2 Soil Scientists, Soil and Water Conservation Research Division, ARS, USDA, Morris, Minn. and Ames, Iowa.

3 The authors express their appreciation to Russell Rosenau Physical Science Technician, and to Elton A. Hallauer, Digital Computer Programmer, for their assistance in the collection and calculation of laboratory data.

Received for publication July 9, 1965. Accepted for publication October 20, 1965.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality		 The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1966 by the Soil Science Society of America.