SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 30:646-649 (1966)
© 1966 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zahner, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hedrich, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zahner, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hedrich, D. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zahner, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hedrich, D. R.

Moisture Release Characteristics of Forested Sand Entisols In Northern Lower Michigan1

Robert Zahner and David R. Hedrich2

ABSTRACT

Forest growth is better on Grayling fine sand than on Grayling medium sand. Moisture release curves were constructed for samples from these two types and for pure sand fractions separated from the samples. Examples of the fine sand soil retained 10% and the medium sand soil retained 7% water by weight at field capacity (.06 atm tension), while both soils retained equal amounts, 2.5%, of water at 15 atm tension. Of the pure sand fractions, very fine sand retained substantially more water at low tensions than did the larger fractions amounting to more than five times the amount of readily available water. The fine sand soil type contained six times the amount of very fine sand fraction than did the medium sand soil type, 12% vs. 2% by weight. Thus, much of the difference in water retention between the two examples is attributed to the very fine sand fraction, probably also accounting for much of the difference in tree growth.


NOTES

1 Contribution of the School of Natural Resources, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. The research was supported by funds from The Michigan Institute of Science and Technology.

2 Professor of Forestry, University of Michigan; and Forester, USDA Forest Service, Milwaukee, Wis., respectively.

Received for publication March 23, 1966. Accepted for publication May 27, 1966.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1966 by the Soil Science Society of America.