SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 31:223-226 (1967)
© 1967 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Power, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Power, J. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Power, J. F.

The Effect of Moisture on Fertilizer Nitrogen Immoblization in Grasslands

J. F. Power2

ABSTRACT

The fate of 500 kg of fertilizer N per ha applied to Bromus inermis L. was followed for 2 years for various moisture levels and times of application. Analysis of the plots at the end of 2 years of irrigation (with no leaching) showed that about 40% of the fertilizer N was contained in grass tops and 25 to 35% in roots, while 5 to 10% was in the soil in mineral form and 20% was not accounted for. For dryland plots this distribution was 25%, 10 to 25%, 25 to 65% and 0 to 20%, respectively. The primary effect of increased water was to hasten plant absorption of fertilizer N. Fertilizer N losses were not affected by moisture supply, thus with proper fertilization it may be possible to maintain a constant pool of available N in grassland soils of semiarid regions without experiencing undue losses. Maximum growth could then be achieved whenever water is available by eliminating N as a growth-limiting factor.

Weekly applications of 17 kg of fertilizer N in fallow plots resulted in about 175% of the fertilizer N being accounted for, but when the fallow plots received all the fertilizer N in the spring only 50 to 60% was accounted for. These differences may have been caused by differences in rates of mineralization and denitrification. Soil NO3-N levels on fertilized dryland often rose during periods of drought. Soil NO3-N levels in fertilized irrigated plots declined with time. Unfertilized plots were conistently very low in soil NO3-N, regardless of time or water supply.


NOTES

2 Soil Scientist, Northern Great Plains Research Center, Mandan North Dakota.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1967 by the Soil Science Society of America.