SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 31:556-559 (1967)
© 1967 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greb, B. W.
Right arrow Articles by Black, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Greb, B. W.
Right arrow Articles by Black, A. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Greb, B. W.
Right arrow Articles by Black, A. L.

Effect of Straw Mulch Rates on Soil Water Storage during Summer Fallow in the Great Plains1

B. W. Greb, D. E. Smika and A. L. Black2

ABSTRACT

Net gains in soil water storage during fallow due to increased quantities of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) straw mulch varied from 1.0 to 4.3 cm at Sidney, Mont., from 2.1 to 4.1 cm at Akron, Colo., and from 1.3 to 3.3 cm at North Platte, Nebr. These gains were made primarily during the spring months of the 14-month fallow season. More than 70% of the net gains in soil water under heavier amounts of mulch was found below the surface 61 cm of the soil profile at all experimental locations, thereby minimizing potential evaporation losses. Storage of water tended to increase with the delayed date of straw burial in Nebraska. Additional soil water was conserved at Akron, Colo. during the first fall by subtillage of wheat stubble at harvest when compared with spring subtillage; however, by the end of the fallow there was no significant difference between treatments. Fallow efficiencies averaged 22, 30, and 32% for all treatments at the Montana, Colorado, and Nebraska locations respectively.

Key Words: evaporation • subsurface tillage


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Northern Plains Branch, Soil and Water Conserv. Res. Div., ARS, USDA, in cooperation with the Colorado Agr. Exp. Sta.

2 Research Soil Scientists, USDA, Akron, Colorado; North Platte, Nebraska; and Sidney, Montana, respectively.

Received for publication January 16, 1967. Accepted for publication February 8, 1967.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
L. R. Ahuja, L. Ma, and D. J. Timlin
Trans-Disciplinary Soil Physics Research Critical to Synthesis and Modeling of Agricultural Systems
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., February 2, 2006; 70(2): 311 - 326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1967 by the Soil Science Society of America.