SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 31:627-631 (1967)
© 1967 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnhisel, R. I.
Right arrow Articles by Rich, C. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Barnhisel, R. I.
Right arrow Articles by Rich, C. I.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Barnhisel, R. I.
Right arrow Articles by Rich, C. I.

Clay Mineral Formation in Different Rock Types of a Weathering Boulder Conglomerate1

R. I. Barnhisel and C. I. Rich2

ABSTRACT

A study was made of the weathering products from individual boulders from a conglomerate composed of boulders having differing geologic origin. A detailed study was made of three of these rocks, namely: granite and granite-gneiss rocks; basic igneous rocks (gabbro); and single feldspar crystals from a pegmatite formation. Clay mineral formation was dependent on the chemical nature of these rock materials and the immediate ionic environment within the weathering boulders. The sodium and potassium feldspar crystals of granitic and gneissic rocks weathered to kaolin minerals, whereas the primary minerals of the gabbro boulders weathered to montmorillonite. Significant differences in cation exchange capacities (CEC) and exchangeable cations were observed for the various weathered boulders. These differences were related to the original parent rock materials and to the present clay mineralogy of the weathered boulders. The dominant cation in all systems was aluminum, which comprised up to 83% of the exchange capacity of the weathered rock that contained a large amount of montmorillonite. Although the amounts of all basic cations in these systems were small, the weathered boulder material in which kaolin clays were predominant contained more Na than did the montmorillonite systems. The reverse was true for exchangeable Mg and K. Exchangeable Ca was small in all samples. The weathered boulders were extremely acid with pH values near 4.3.

Key Words: montmorillonite formation • kaolinite formation • soil formation


NOTES

1 Contribution of the Agronomy Department, University of Kentucky, Lexington, and the Agronomy Department, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg. Published (as journal article No. 66-3-15) with permission of the Director of the Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station. Presented before a joint session of Div. S-2 and S-5, Soil Science Society of America Columbus, Ohio, Nov. 1, 1965.

2 Assistant Professor of Agronomy, University of Kentucky and Professor of Agronomy, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, respectively.

Received for publication February 16, 1967. Accepted for publication June 6, 1967.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1967 by the Soil Science Society of America.