SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 32:113-117 (1968)
© 1968 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pionke, H. B.
Right arrow Articles by Schulte, E. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pionke, H. B.
Right arrow Articles by Schulte, E. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pionke, H. B.
Right arrow Articles by Schulte, E. E.

Contributions of Soil Factors to Lime Requirement and Lime Requirement Tests1

H. B. Pionke, R. B. Corey and E. E. Schulte2

ABSTRACT

One hundred and twenty-seven soils were examined for relationships existing between lime requirement and the pH-dependent sites on organic matter and clay as well as "acidic Al." The ranking of soil properties as predictors of the CaCO3-equilibrated lime requirement followed the order: pH-dependent sites on organic matter > nonexchangeable acidic Al > exchangeable Al ≥ pH-dependent sites on clay. This relationship is defined by the following equation which accounts for 89.5% of the observed variability of lime requirement as determined by neutralization with CaCO3 to pH 6.0 in N KCl: LR (meq/100g) = 0.47 + 0.97 {Delta}pH(KCl) x % OM + 0.03 {Delta}pH(KCl) x % clay + 1.73 exchangeable Al + 0.53 non-exchangeable acidic Al.

A number of the more commonly used lime requirement tests were evaluated as predictors of the CaCO3-equilibrated lime requirement. Of these tests, the buffer methods were found to be superior to the {Delta}pH x % organic matter function and base unsaturation, which in turn were decidedly superior to percent base saturation for predicting soil lime requirement. The Shoemaker, McLean, and Pratt buffer was found to be somewhat better than the Woodruff buffer for measuring lime requirement, apparently because of its greater sensitivity to "acidic Al."


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Soils Dep., Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison. Published with permission of the Director of the Wisconsin Agr. Exp. Sta. This work was supported in part by a grant from the Wisconsin Processed Limestone Ass. and the Wisconsin Aglime Producers Ass.

2 Research Assistant, Professor, and Assistant Professor of Soils, respectively.

Received for publication June 29, 1967. Accepted for publication September 6, 1967.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1968 by the Soil Science Society of America.