SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 32:866-870 (1968)
© 1968 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Matelski, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Matelski, R. P.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Matelski, R. P.

Moisture Characteristics of Pennsylvania Soils: II. Soil Factors Affecting Mositure Retention Within a Textural Class—Silt Loam1

G. W. Petersen, R. L. Cunningham and R. P. Matelski2

ABSTRACT

The relationships of morphology and other selected soil properties to mositure retained after equilibration at 1/3 and 15 atm (approx. 0.34 and 15.5 kg/cm2) tension was investigated within silt loams. This laboratory study was restricted to an individual textural class in an effort to hold texture relatively constant while scrutinizing the influence of other soil properties upon the soil moisture regime.

Available moisture, which is assumed as the difference between moisture retained at 1/3 and 15 atm tension, was generally highest in the A, less in the B, and lowest in the C horizon. This moisture retention however, was more a reflection of coarse fragment content than of such horizon developmental features as clay accumulation, gleying, structural development, or fragipan characteristics. There was no significant difference between the moisture retention of cultivated and noncultivated horizons nor between the moisture supplying abilities of gleyed and nongleyed horizons. Nonfragic horizons retained almost twice as much available moisture as fragic horizons.

Moisture retention decreases as coarse fragments increase and therefore moisture retention calculations should be corrected for coarse fragments. Available moisture remained almost constant as organic matter increased within silt loams. Weight percentage contents of kaolinite, illite, vermiculite, montmorillonite, chlorite, and interstratified clays were not significantly correlated with moisture retention. Correlation analyses suggested the 20-5µ silt as the most important <2 mm size separate controlling available moisture and moisture retained at field capacity.


NOTES

1 Authorized for publication on March 18, 1968 as paper no. 3377 of the Journal Series of the Pennsylvania Agr. Exp. Sta., University Park.

2 Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor of Soil Technology, The Pennsylvania State University, respectively.

Received for publication April 11, 1968. Accepted for publication July 15, 1968.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1968 by the Soil Science Society of America.