SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 34:281-287 (1970)
© 1970 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cipra, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Rohlf, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cipra, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Rohlf, F. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cipra, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Rohlf, F. J.

Numerical Taxonomy of Soils from Nine Orders by Cluster and Centroid-Component Analyses1

J. E. Cipra, O. W. Bidwell and F. J. Rohlf2

ABSTRACT

Multivariate statistical procedures of numerical taxonomy were used to investigate the patterns of similarities among 59 soils. Twenty-one morphological and laboratory characteristics of modal soil profiles from nine orders of the new classification system were used. Characters were selected to avoid high intercorrelations. Raw character values were transformed to give each character a mean of zero and variance of unity. Centroidcomponent analysis with projections of soils onto centroidcharacter axes was employed. This facilitated expression of similarities among soils in three dimensions in a manner which did not assume that clusters of soils existed. Correlation and distance matrices also were computed to obtain two estimates of the similarity of each individual to every other. Similarities among soils as indicated by these two matrices were summarized by cluster analysis. Results were displayed in phenograms yielding a system of nested clusters of soils.

The three methods of estimating and summarizing similarity relationships gave comparable results. The numerical classifications agreed, in general, with the new classification system with respect to Mollisols, Alfisols, Inceptisols, Entisols, and Spodosols. Vertisols showed little affinity for one another, Aridisols clustered with Mollisols and Alfisols, and the single Oxisol clustered with Ultisols. Ultisols showed no special affinity for other Ultisols. Numerical taxonomic methods are capable of summarizing large amounts of new data efficiently, making them a valuable soil classification tool.


NOTES

1 Contribution no. 1072, Department of Agronomy, Kansas Agr. Exp. Sta., Kansas State University, Manhattan, 66502. Presented before Div. S-5, Soil Science Society of America, Washington, D.C., Nov. 8, 1967.

2 NDEA Fellow and Agronomist, respectively, Kansas State University, and Assoc. Prof. of Biology, State University of New York, Stony Brook, L.I., N.Y.

Received for publication April 10, 1969. Accepted for publication November 19, 1969.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1970 by the Soil Science Society of America.