SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 35:658-660 (1971)
© 1971 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cate, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cate, R. B., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, L. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cate, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, L. A.

A Simple Statistical Procedure for Partitioning Soil Test Correlation Data Into Two Classes1

Robert B. Cate, Jr. and Larry A. Nelson2

ABSTRACT

Most soil test laboratories divide soil test results into two or more classes for the purpose of making fertilizer recommendations. This is usually done for the practical reason that it reduces the number of different recommendations necessary. However, the basis for defining the different classes (e.g., Very Low, Low, Medium, etc.) is often subjective or arbitrary. This paper explains a simple, yet statistically sound, method for setting the class limits. The procedure is to split the data into two groups, using successive tentative critical levels to ascertain that particular critical level which will maximize overall predictive ability (R2), with the means of the two groups (classes) as the predictor values. The paper presents an actual example, using data believed typical of this kind of problem. Several continuous correlation models were also fitted to the same data. None gave as high an R2 as a single Low-High split defined by the suggested procedure. Similar results have been obtained with a majority of 200 sets of soil test correlation data, indicating that the new procedure may be widely applicable.


NOTES

1 Paper no. 3372 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina State Univ. Exp. Sta., Raleigh, N.C. This study was supported by the Agency for International Development, Department of State, Washington, D.C.

2 Research Associate, International Soil Fertility Evaluation & Improvement Program, Dept. of Soil Science, and Professor, Dept. of Statistics, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, N.C.

Received for publication January 18, 1971. Accepted for publication March 18, 1971.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1971 by the Soil Science Society of America.