SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 36:855-857 (1972)
© 1972 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hanks, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hanks, R. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hanks, R. J.

Influence of Water Content on Electrical Conductivity of the Soil1

S. C. Gupta and R. J. Hanks2

ABSTRACT

Measurement of dynamic salinity and water content profiles under laboratory conditions were needed to test a model developed to characterize the simultaneous flow of water and salts in soils. Methods were needed for measuring salinity in place in a system where rapid water movement occurred. Because of the time lag in salinity sensors, other methods were considered for evaluating salinity.

The four-probe system of measuring electrical conductivity of soil eliminates the time lag error, but introduces the problem of correcting the changes in conductivity caused by water content. Units were constructed and samples prepared to evaluate the influence of water content, and salt concentrations on the four-probe conductivity (K4P). Two soils were studied. Regression equations developed to estimate saturation or 1:5 extract electrical conductivity from four-probe conductivity and water content ({pi}) gave correlation coefficients of 0.75 and 0.90, respectively. Correlations for individual soils were generally higher than the combined soils. The regression equation relating the ratio of K4P to four-probe conductivity at saturation (K 4PS) with water content was 4K4P/K4PS = – 0.26 + 2.49{pi} with a correlation coefficient of 0.88 for the combined soil data.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Dep. of Soil Sci. and Biometeorology, Utah Agr. Exp. Sta., Logan, Utah 84321. Journal paper no. 1238. Supported in part by a grant from the Environmental Protection Agency, US Government.

2 Research Assistant and Professor, respectively.

Received for publication March 8, 1972. Accepted for publication June 16, 1972.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
D. A. Robinson, C. S. Campbell, J. W. Hopmans, B. K. Hornbuckle, S. B. Jones, R. Knight, F. Ogden, J. Selker, and O. Wendroth
Soil Moisture Measurement for Ecological and Hydrological Watershed-Scale Observatories: A Review
Vadose Zone J., February 25, 2008; 7(1): 358 - 389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1972 by the Soil Science Society of America.