SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 37:111-115 (1973)
© 1973 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boawn, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Boawn, L. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Boawn, L. C.

Comparison of Zinc Sulfate and Zine EDTA as Zine Fertilizer Sources1

Louis C. Boawn2

ABSTRACT

Field experiments were performed to compare the agronomic effectiveness of a chelate Zn source (ZnEDTA) with that of an inorganic Zn source (ZnSO4 · H2O). Effectiveness was determined on the basis of Zn in bean plans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) at the 4-compound-leaf stage and at early bloom, and Zn in corn plants (Zea mays L.) just before tasseling. Comparisons were made using three methods of Zn fertilizer application: (i) broadcast and plowed down, (ii) banded prior to planting, and (iii) broadcast and leached with sprinkler irrigation. The latter method was intended to approximate application of Zn by injection into sprinkler-applied irrigation water.

Where the Zn sources were broadcast and plowed down, 1 unit of Zn applied as the chelate was equivalent to approximately 2 to 2.5 units applied in sulfate form. The effectiveness ratio appeared to be slightly greater, at least 2.5, when Zn was banded prior to planting. Where the Zn sources were broadcast and leached in with sprinkler irrigation, increasing rates of ZnSO4 had no effect on the amount of Zn in bean plants. In contrast, ZnEDTA was a highly effective source of Zn when applied in this manner.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Soil and Water Conservation Research Division, ARS, USDA, in cooperation with the College of Agriculture, Washington State University. Scientific Paper 3854.

2 Soil Scientist, USDA, Prosser, Washington 99350.

Received for publication July 11, 1972. Accepted for publication October 10, 1972.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1973 by the Soil Science Society of America.