SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 37:702-707 (1973)
© 1973 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goswami, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Green, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Goswami, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Green, R. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Goswami, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Green, R. E.

Simultaneous Extraction of Hydroxyatrazine, Atrazine, and Ametryne from Some Hawaiian Soils1

Kishore P. Goswami and Richard E. Green2

ABSTRACT

A simple procedure is described for simultaneous extraction from soil of 2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-s-triazine (atrazine), 2-methylthio-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-s-triazine (ametryne) and their common hydrolysate (hydroxyatrazine = HA). The procedure involves extraction by shaking in acidified methanol, centrifugation, and subsequent quantitative separation of HA from the parent triazines by liquid-liquid partitioning. The pH of methanol was adjusted with 4N HCl to obtain a final pH of 2.5 in the soil extract, using a 1:10 soil/solvent ratio. HA recovery with one extraction was 94% for both Molokai (Typic Torrox) and Hilo (Hydrandept) soils having soil extract pH values of 2.4 and 3.4, respectively. In all cases atrazine and ametryne were quantitatively recovered in soil extracts. After protonation HA was quantitatively separated from the mixture of HA and atrazine or ametryne by partitioning in an aqueous methanolic soil-extract/chloroform system when the water/methanol extract ratio was 1.25. HA extraction from soil was extremely pH dependent. Dissolution of calcium chloride in acidified methanol decreased recovery of added HA from 94% to 76% for Hilo soil but had no effect on % HA recovery from Molokai soil; the electrolyte was found to increase the pH of Hilo soil extract, a result of the net positive charge of this soil at low pH. The recovery of added HA from Ca-montmorillonite was 33%, suggesting that the procedure may be less suitable for soils with high permanent negative charge.


NOTES

1 Journal Series no. 1490 of the Hawaii Agr. Exp. Sta. Part of a dissertation submitted by the senior author in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Ph.D. degree in Soil Science.

2 Junior Soil Scientist and Professor, respectively, Dep. of Agronomy and Soil Science, Univ. of Hawaii, Honolulu.

Received for publication July 31, 1972. Accepted for publication May 31, 1973.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1973 by the Soil Science Society of America.