SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 38:676-678 (1974)
© 1974 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duffy, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by McClurkin, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Duffy, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by McClurkin, D. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Duffy, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by McClurkin, D. C.

Difficult Eroded Planting Sites in North Mississippi Evaluated by Discriminant Analysis1

Paul D. Duffy and D. C. McClurkin2

ABSTRACT

A discriminant analysis of physical and chemical characteristics of the upper 23 cm of the soil was computed for 24 sites where bar-planted loblolly pines (Pinus taeda L.) had failed and at 15 successful plantations near the fail sites. Screening of 17 soil properties indicated that bulk density is the best variable for classifying sites. A function based only on bulk density correctly classified 74% of the sites as fail or success, regardless of microrelief. On sites where bulk density equaled or exceeded 1.45 g/cm3 bar planting was predicted to fail. Information on a site's proximity to the rim or bottom of a deep gully improved accuracy of classification. Since other soil properties differed relatively little between success and fail sites, results suggest that high bulk density substantially contributed to pine mortality, either through physical impedance of root growth or poor aeration or by interference with proper planting.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Forest Hydrology Laboratory maintained at Oxford, Miss. by the Southern Forest Exp. Sta., Forest Service, USDA, in cooperation with the University of Mississippi. Paper presented before Div. S-7, Soil Science Society of America, 12 Nov. 1973. Las Vegas, Nev.

2 Associate Soil Scientist and Principal Soil Scientist, respectively, Oxford, Miss. 38655.

Received for publication December 14, 1973. Accepted for publication April 29, 1974.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1974 by the Soil Science Society of America.