SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 39:224-230 (1975)
© 1975 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neuman, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bresler, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Neuman, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bresler, E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Neuman, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bresler, E.

Finite Element Analysis of Two-Dimensional Flow in Soils Considering Water Uptake by Roots: I. Theory1

Shlomo P. Neuman, Reinder A. Feddes and Eshel Bresler2

ABSTRACT

The problem of two-dimensional nonsteady flow of water in unsaturated and partly saturated porous media is solved by a Galerkin-type finite element approach. Particular emphasis is placed upon the simulation of atmospheric boundaries and of water uptake by plant roots. The finite element method is shown to have several advantages over conventional finite difference techniques. It can easily handle nonuniform flow regions having irregular boundaries and arbitrary degrees of local anisotropy. Nonlinear atmospheric boundary conditions along evaporation or infiltration surfaces and along seepage faces are handled by a unique procedure. This iterative procedure relies on the ease with which flux normal to any boundary of the flow region is assigned in the finite element approach. Our experience with this method indicates that rapid rates of convergence can be achieved in many cases. Part I of the paper presents the theory, whereas Part II is devoted to a field test of the finite element method and to a comparison of the results with those obtained from a one-dimensional finite difference model.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Division of Soil Physics, Institute of Soils & Water, Agricultural Research Organization, Bet Dagan, Israel. 1974 Series, no. 193-E.

2 Research Hydrologist, Inst. of Soils and Water, ARO, Bet Dagan, Israel; Soil Scientist, on leave from the Inst. for Land & Water Management Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands; and Soil Scientist, Inst. of Soils & Water, ARO, Bet Dagan, Israel, respectively.

Received for publication June 10, 1974. Accepted for publication October 7, 1974.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1975 by the Soil Science Society of America.