SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 39:896-901 (1975)
© 1975 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shearer, G.
Right arrow Articles by Legg, J. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shearer, G.
Right arrow Articles by Legg, J. O.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Shearer, G.
Right arrow Articles by Legg, J. O.

Variations in the Natural Abundance of 15N of Wheat Plants in Relation to Fertilizer Nitrogen Applications1

Georgia Shearer and J. O. Legg2

ABSTRACT

Measurements were made by two laboratories of the {delta}15N (per mill 15N excess) of winter wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.) grown at five locations in Pennsylvania on experimental plots. The plots were fertilized with N at various rates. The results from both laboratories showed a consistent decline in {delta}15N with increasing rates of N application. Such a decrease in {delta}15N is consistent with increasing contributions of fertilizer N to the plants as the rate of application increased, given that fertilizer N has a lower 15N content than the soil N. The coefficients of regression of {delta}15N of wheat on N application rate were always negative and usually significantly different from zero. The regression coefficients computed from the results of the two laboratories were not significantly different from each other in 12 of 16 experiments. There was, however, a systematic, unexplained difference in the results from the two laboratories. A regression of one set of data on the other resulted in a regression coefficient significantly different from one, the theoretically expected value.


NOTES

1 The work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under the Project Number GI-39009A 2.

2 Research Associate, Center for the Biology of Natural Systems, Washington University, St. Louis, MO., 63130; Soil Scientist, Plant Nutrition Lab., USDA, Agricultural Research Service, NE Region, Agricultural Research Center, Beltsville, MD., 20705.

Received for publication February 5, 1975. Accepted for publication June 9, 1975.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1975 by the Soil Science Society of America.