SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 39:954-957 (1975)
© 1975 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pearson, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pearson, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, D. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pearson, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, D. M.

Effects of Grazing on Infiltration Rates in Waste Water Spray Fields1

George A. Pearson2, Gerald A. Jung3, Richard E. Fowler4 and Donald M. Mitchell5

ABSTRACT

Many food-processors use grass-covered sprayfields for treating waste water. These fields are generally mowed one or more times each year. To eliminate mowing costs, such fields could be fenced and used as irrigated pastures. However, since the primary purpose of such fields is waste water treatment, adverse effects on infiltration must be avoided, particularly in areas with shallow soils that cannot be manipulated for overland-flow.

A portion of a food-processor's wastewater treatment field was fenced and grazed for approximately 5 months during the summer and fall of 2 successive years. The soil series was Sassafras sandy loam and the grass species were ‘Kentucky 31’ tall fescue [Festuca elatior var. arundinacea (Schreb.) Wimm.] and orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata, L.).

The infiltration rate at saturation was measured frequently throughout the period of grazing. It was found that trampling reduced the infiltration rate from an initial value of 2–2.5 cm/hr to a final value of 0.3 cm/hr.

If these fields are to be grazed, it will be necessary to use low wastewater application rates to avoid surface runoff and ponding in low spots.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Soil, Water and Air Sciences; ARS, USDA in cooperation with the College of Agric., Univ. of Delaware, Newark, Del.; Virginia Truck and Ornamentals Res. Sta., Norfolk, Va.; Mid-Atlantic Food Processors Assoc., Inc., Easton, Md.; Sussex Soil Conservation District, Georgetown, Del.; and H. P. Cannon & Son, Inc., Bridgeville, DE 19933.

2 Plant Physiologist and Chemist, USDA, ARS, Plant Science Division. West Virginia Univ., Morgantown, W.V. 26506.

3 Agronomist, US Regional Pasture Research Laboratory, USDA, ARS, University Park, PA 16802.

4 Livestock Specialist, Animal Science and Agricultural Biochemistry, College of Agriculture, Univ. of Delaware, Newark, DE 19711.

5 Chemist, USDA, ARS, RD 2, Box 600, Georgetown, DE 19947.

Received for publication February 12, 1975. Accepted for publication March 27, 1975.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1975 by the Soil Science Society of America.