SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 40:46-51 (1976)
© 1976 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Munns, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Fox, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Munns, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Fox, R. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Munns, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Fox, R. L.

The Slow Reaction which Continues After Phosphate Adsorption: Kinetics and Equilibrium in Some Tropical Soils1

D. N. Munns and R. L. Fox2

ABSTRACT

Dissolved phosphate was mixed with topsoil samples, and the decline in solution phosphate concentration (P) was followed for 200–300 days by periodically shaking and extracting subsamples with 1 or 10 mM CaCl2 (1:10).

During the first 20–40 days, (P) declined faster in soil suspensions that were being shaken than it did in undisturbed soil at 0.1 bar moisture. After 40 days of reaction, shaking time had little effect.

The slow fixation had first-order kinetics with respect to (P). The relative rate was faster in an Andept than in three Oxisols. It was unaffected by lime, though lime increased the strength of adsorption.

Equilibrium was achieved at 50 days in an Andept and 100–200 days in three Oxisols. At equilibrium, the amount of adsorbed phosphate remaining labile was estimated from values of (P), using 6-day adsorption isotherms. Labile phosphate so estimated amounted to 30–50% of the added phosphate, implying that the residual value of phosphate added to these soils should be substantial and permanent except for removal by crops and erosion.

Desorption isotherms diverged from adsorption isotherms less markedly with increasing time after phosphate addition, as if the slow reaction caused much of the apparent hysteresis.


NOTES

1 Joint contribution from Dep. of Soils & Plant Nutrition, Univ. of California, Davis, CA95616, and Dep. of Agronomy & Soil Science, Univ. of Hawaii. Journal series no. 1954 of Hawaii Agric. Exp. Stn. Supported by a grant from U.S. Agency for International Development to Univ. of Hawaii under section 211-D of Foreign Assistance Act, 1961.

2 Associate Prof., Univ. of California, and Professor, Univ. of Hawaii, respectively.

Received for publication June 16, 1975. Accepted for publication September 3, 1975.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
F. Fang, P. L. Brezonik, D. J. Mulla, and L. K. Hatch
Characterization of Soil Algal Bioavailable Phosphorus in the Minnesota River Basin
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., June 2, 2005; 69(4): 1016 - 1025.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1976 by the Soil Science Society of America.