SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 40:60-63 (1976)
© 1976 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Valoras, N.
Right arrow Articles by Osborn, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Valoras, N.
Right arrow Articles by Osborn, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Valoras, N.
Right arrow Articles by Osborn, J.

Degradation of a Nonionic Surfactant in Soils and Peat1

N. Valoras, J. Letey, J. P. Martin and J. Osborn2

ABSTRACT

Nonionic surfactants are used to improve water movement into water-repellent soils. The effective longevity of treatment and potential water pollution are affected by surfactant degradation. Degradation of 14C-labeled Soil Penetrant 3685, a nonionic surfactant, was measured in incubation studies in the laboratory. Three soils and one peat, numerous surfactant concentrations, and two soil-moisture levels were used as experimental variables. Plots of degradation percentage versus time produced "S" type curves. Increasing the concentration increased the lag period prior to most rapid degradation. The most rapid and highest percentage of degradation were generally associated with soil materials having the lowest adsorptive capacity for the surfacant. From about 75 to 85% of the added 14C was evolved as 14CO2 in 1 year for the most favorable conditions for degradation. Degradation rate was decreased by decreasing the soil-moisture content. Degradation of soil organic matter was not greatly affected by surfactant applications—< about 10,000 ppm, but progressively decreased with higher surfactant concentrations.


NOTES

1 Contribution of the Dep. of Soil Science and Agric. Engineering, Univ. of California, Riverside CA 92502. The research leading to this report was supported by the Office of Water Resources Research, USDI, under the Matching Funds program of Public Law 88-379 as amended, and by the Univ. of California Water Res. Center. It is a part of Water Resources Research Proj. No. B-141-CAL (Water Resources Center Proj. W-332).

2 Staff Res. Associate, Prof. of Soil Physics, Prof. of Soil Science, and Staff Res. Associate, respectively.

Received for publication July 7, 1975. Accepted for publication September 19, 1975.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1976 by the Soil Science Society of America.