SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 41:285-294 (1977)
© 1977 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haverkamp, R.
Right arrow Articles by Vachaud, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Haverkamp, R.
Right arrow Articles by Vachaud, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Haverkamp, R.
Right arrow Articles by Vachaud, G.

A Comparison of Numerical Simulation Models For One-Dimensional Infiltration1

R. Haverkamp, M. Vauclin, J. Touma, P. J. Wierenga3 and G. Vachaud2

ABSTRACT

Six models, employing different ways of discretization of the nonlinear infiltration equation were compared in terms of execution time, accuracy, and programming considerations. All models yielded excellent agreement with water content profiles measured at various times in a sand column. The two explicit models, the {theta}-based CSMP model and the h-based explicit model, used between 5 and 10 times more computer time than the implicit models. Results obtained with the two models which used the Kirchhoff integral transformation were no better than those obtained with the two h-based implicit models. The implicit schemes with implicit, or explicit evaluation of the hydraulic conductivity and water capacity functions appear to have the widest range of applicability for predicting water movement in soil with both saturated and nonsaturated regions. Excellent agreement was obtained between water content distributions, infiltration rates, and cumulative infiltration volumes calculated with the implicit finite difference model and Philip's quasi-analytical solution.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Institut de Mécanique, Université Scientifique et Médicale, B. P. 53, GRENOBLE (France). Supported in part from Ministère de al Qualité de la Vie, Environement, PARIS. Grant. 75.102.

2 Research Associate, Attaché de Recherche CNRS, Research Associate, Associate Professor, and Maître de Recherches CNRS, respectively.

3 On sabbatical leave (1975) from the Dep. of Agronomy, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003.

Received for publication July 19, 1976. Accepted for publication November 18, 1976.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
R. W. Healy
Simulating Water, Solute, and Heat Transport in the Subsurface with the VS2DI Software Package
Vadose Zone J., May 27, 2008; 7(2): 632 - 639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
R. Haverkamp, F. J. Leij, C. Fuentes, A. Sciortino, and P. J. Ross
Soil Water Retention: I. Introduction of a Shape Index
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., October 27, 2005; 69(6): 1881 - 1890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
L. Prunty and J. Bell
Soil Temperature Change over Time during Infiltration
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 6, 2005; 69(3): 766 - 775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
J. Wu, D. L. Nofziger, J. G. Warren, and J. A. Hattey
Modeling Ammonia Volatilization from Surface-Applied Swine Effluent
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2003; 67(1): 1 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1977 by the Soil Science Society of America.