SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 41:766-770 (1977)
© 1977 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bouma, J.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bouma, J.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bouma, J.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J. L.

Water and Chloride Movement Through Soil Columns Simulating Pedal Soils1

J. Bouma and J. L. Anderson2

ABSTRACT

Interpretation of dispersion phenomena in soils is complicated by many complex interactions within the highly heterogeneous pore system. Model experiments were therefore designed to investigate the specific effects on hydrodynamic dispersion of (i) vertically continuous macropores in different types of microstructure and (ii) different flow regimes. Two homogeneous microstructures were formed by mixing, puddling, and drying of sand and silty clay loam materials to sandy loam and clay loam textures. Small vertically continuous cylindrical pores were made in 30-cm long columns that had a diameter of 10 cm to simulate macropores. Breakthrough curves, following a daily 0.5-cm application of chloride solution, showed that identical macropores have different hydraulic functions in different soil materials. This intermittent flow resulted in much better displacement of untraced water in the more permeable sandy loam columns, but "immobile" water remained in both soils. Dispersion phenomena in both microstructures (which represented two "ideal" textural porosities) differed significantly when saturated flow was compared with flow through a crust. Implications for the physical interpretation of soil structure descriptions are discussed.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Soil Science Dep., Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison and the Geological and Natural History Survey, Univ. Extension. Funded in part by the State of Wisconsin and the Environmental Protection Agency (Grant R802874).

2 Soil Scientist, Soil Survey Institute, Box 98, Wageningen, The Netherlands (formerly Associate Professor of Soil Science, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison), District Soil Scientist Hennepin Soil and Water Conservation District, 250 N. Central Ave., Wayzata, MN 55391 (formerly Research Assistant, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison).

Received for publication June 21, 1976. Accepted for publication April 1, 1977.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
M. Ghodrati, M. Chendorain, and Y.J. Chang
Characterization of Macropore Flow Mechanisms in Soil by Means of a Split Macropore Column
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 1999; 63(5): 1093 - 1101.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1977 by the Soil Science Society of America.