SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 42:61-66 (1978)
© 1978 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gilliam, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Focht, D. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gilliam, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Focht, D. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gilliam, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Focht, D. D.

Denitrification in Four California Soils: Effect of Soil Profile Characteristics1

J. W. Gilliam, S. Dasberg, L. J. Lund and D. D. Focht2

ABSTRACT

The effects of soil profile characteristics upon rate and products of denitrification were investigated using four soils in laboratory columns under steady-state water flow conditions. A general relationship existed between soil texture and amount of denitrification. Soils with heavy textured subsoils readily reduced added NO3. However, the soil with the lowest clay content had restricted water flow in the surface horizon and reduced the greatest amount of NO3. The relationship between soil texture and denitrification is a result of the relationship between water flow and denitrification. It was concluded that any soil condition which impedes water flow will be positively related to denitrification and that spatial variability in denitrification is likely to be as great as observed variability in water movement.

The ratio of N2 to N2O found during denitrification was extremely variable with measured values from 100:1 to 1:4. The low concentrations of N2O measured during denitrification occurred in soils where the denitrification was occurring deep in the soil profile, but there was no indication that this low concentration was a result of further reduction of N2O as N2O diffused through the soil profile. Our data indicate that it is currently not possible to accurately predict relative amounts of N2 and N2O which will be produced during most denitrification in soils, and that estimates of that N2O produced from agricultural lands have a large uncertainty factor.


NOTES

1 Contribution of Dep. of Soil Sci. & Agric. Eng., Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92502. The research was supported by grant GI 34733x of the National Science Foundation.

2 Visiting Research Soil Scientists, Assistant Professor and Associate Professor, respectively. Senior author was on leave from North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, North Carolina, and second author was on leave from the Inst. of Soils and Water, Agric. Res. Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel.

Received for publication March 30, 1977. Accepted for publication August 30, 1977.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
T. T. Bergsma, G. P. Robertson, and N. E. Ostrom
Influence of Soil Moisture and Land Use History on Denitrification End-Products
J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2002; 31(3): 711 - 717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1978 by the Soil Science Society of America.