SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 42:316-318 (1978)
© 1978 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Patrick, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Patrick, W. H., Jr.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Patrick, W. H.

Residual Fertilizer Nitrogen in a Flooded Rice Soil1

K. R. Reddy and W. H. Patrick, Jr.2

ABSTRACT

Residual effects of 15N-labelled fertilizer (ammonium sulfate) nitrogen were measured during the second cropping season of rice (Oryza sativa L.). During the first cropping season, labelled fertilizer N was applied at 100 kg N/ha using different methods of N application. At the end of harvest the rice straw obtained during the first cropping season was incorporated back into the respective plots. During the second season half the plots were treated with an additional 100 kg N/ha of nonlabelled fertilizer N as an early season top dressing. The uptake of residual labelled N (that present in the native soil organic matter and in the incorporated rice straw) was measured during the growing season and at harvest time under fertilized and nonfertilized conditions.

The recovery of residual labelled N in grain and straw was 2.7 to 3.1 kg N/ha, with a large fraction of N (34.3 to 40.1 kg N/ha) still remaining in the soil. Approximately 3 to 5 kg of the residual labelled N/ha present at the beginning of the season was not accounted for in any fraction and was assumed to be lost from the system. Over a 2-year period, about 66 to 82% of the applied labelled fertilizer N could be accounted for by plant uptake or in the soil with the remainder lost from the plant-soil system.


NOTES

1 Contribution from Laboratory of Flooded Soils and Sediments, Dep. of Agronomy, Louisiana Agric. Exp. Stn., Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA 70803. This study was conducted cooperatively with Tennessee Valley Authority, Soil and Fertilizer Research Branch, Div. of Agric. Develop.

2 Research Associate and Professor, respectively. The senior author is presently working as post-doctoral research associate, Dep. of Biological and Agric. Eng., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27607.

Received for publication May 10, 1977. Accepted for publication December 15, 1977.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1978 by the Soil Science Society of America.