SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 42:632-637 (1978)
© 1978 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hadas, A.
Right arrow Articles by Meirson, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hadas, A.
Right arrow Articles by Meirson, I.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hadas, A.
Right arrow Articles by Meirson, I.

Tillage Implements – Soil Structure Relationships and Their Effects on Crop Stands1

A. Hadas, D. Wolf and I. Meirson2

ABSTRACT

Under rainfed dryland farming, tillage performed on a dry soil prior to the rainy season is the most important practice to improve the soil physical conditions for crop establishment and development. However, questions have seldom been raised as to the degree of clod breakdown required to improve soil physical conditions for seed germination, as well as the cost in energy and number of implements involved.

The objectives of the work reported here were to: (i) collect and correlate data concerning energy input with the degree of soil clod breakdown and aggregate size distributions attained by various tillage implements and operation sequences when performed on dry soils; and (ii) to compare crop stands under field conditions on differently tilled plots.

Crop stands and fineness of seedbed tilth were not significantly correlated. Yet, finer tilth could only be obtained through an elaborate tillage operation sequence and a tremendous input of energy if performed on air dry soils, whereas tilling the same soil while moist (approximately at wilting point-moisture content), produced finer tilth at a much lower energy input.


NOTES

1 Contribution of the Agric. Res. Organ., Bet Dagan, Israel, The Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel, and the Univ. of Calif. Riverside, CA 92521. This work was partially supported by AID/ta-G-1141 grant.

2 Soil Scientist, Div. of Soil Physics, Institute of Soils and Water, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Box 6, Israel (During 1976–77 on sabbatical leave at the Univ. of Calif., Riverside, CA 92521); and Faculty of Agric. Eng., The Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel, respectively.

Received for publication April 27, 1977. Accepted for publication March 21, 1978.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
D. Pimentel, M. A. Moran, S. Fast, G. Weber, R. Bukantis, L. Balliett, P. Boveng, C. Cleveland, S. Hindman, and M. Young
Biomass Energy from Crop and Forest Residues
Science, June 5, 1981; 212(4499): 1110 - 1115.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1978 by the Soil Science Society of America.