SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:28-34 (1979)
© 1979 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prunty, L.
Right arrow Articles by Kirkham, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Prunty, L.
Right arrow Articles by Kirkham, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Prunty, L.
Right arrow Articles by Kirkham, D.

A Drainage Model for a Reclaimed Surface Mine1

Lyle Prunty and Don Kirkham2

ABSTRACT

Stripmine reclamation for row-crop production employing bench-terraced geometry is under study and may become increasingly common. A simplified model of the postreclamation soil profile at the Iowa Coal Project Demonstration Mine No. I is created. The model is used to find the steady-state water-table shape if one tube drain per terrace is installed. Dupuit-Forchheimer (D. F.) theory is used for the analyses. Water-table curves are generated for a series of alternative drain-tube locations. An analysis is made to find the best position for the drain tube. It is found that, for a recharge-to-soil-conductivity ratio of 0.01 for terraces repeating at a 45.7-m (150-ft) interval, the best drain-tube location is beneath the horizontal portion of the terrace 4.87 m (16 ft) from the toe of the backslope if the drain tubes are placed 2.44 m (8 ft) beneath the surface of soil underlaid by a barrier at 3.05 m (10 ft) depth. The horizontal portion of the bench terraces is 38.08 m (125 ft), and the vertical drop from one terrace to the next is 3.05 m (10 ft). A table of best drain locations is given for other drain depths and recharge rates. Previous work on D.F. theory for a uniformly sloped barrier is discussed briefly and compared with and contrasted to the present work for a barrier that parallels the bench-terraced surface of the reclaimed surface mine.


NOTES

1 Journal Paper No. J-9126 of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, Iowa. Project No. 2166. Research supported by Cooperative State Research Service Special Grant No. 684-15-2 under the Mineland Reclamation Research Program.

2 Research Assistant, and Professor of Agronomy and Physics, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011, respectively. The senior author is now Assistant Professor, Department of Soils, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58102. The authors thank Mr. S. B. Affleck for use of infiltration data.

Received for publication April 12, 1978. Accepted for publication September 21, 1978.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1979 by the Soil Science Society of America.