SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:754-758 (1979)
© 1979 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhushan, L. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bhushan, L. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bhushan, L. S.

Conservation Bench Terraces for Rice in a Subhumid Climate1

L. S. Bhushan2

ABSTRACT

Rain-fed crops in northern India produce less than the potential maximum due to moisture stress at crucial stages of plant development. Research was initiated on a conservation bench terrace (CBT) system to evaluate its potential to increase water supply for increasing and stabilizing rice production on 2.5% sloping land in the subhumid climate. The width ratios of the contributing area to the collection area (terrace benches) were 0:1, 1:1, 2:1, and 3:1. The contributing area was cropped with corn planted on the contour.

Six years of research have shown that levelled benches received 0.25, 0.50, and 0.76 m3/m2 of estimated runoff from the 1:1, 2:1, and 3:1 ratios, respectively. Consequently, measured soil water in the level benches was greater than the storage in level benches without a contributing area at the time of panicle emergence. The rice yields in the level benches with contributing areas were 21, 47, and 88%, respectively, greater on three ratios than yields on the level check without a contributing area. The 84% increase in rice grain yield on the 3:1 CBT was attributed to increased soil water content at panicle emergence.

A major advantage of the CBT system was that chances of crop failure were reduced. The probability of obtaining rice yields of < 1,400 kg/ha was decreased from 50% on level bench to 16% in level benches with a 3:1 ratio. Similarly, the probability of achieving yields > 3,500 kg/ha was 50% in the 3:1 CBT system and 0% in the level bench (NW). Total dry matter production for the 3:1 CBT system was 1.7 times greater than the level check.


NOTES

1 Authorized for publication by the Director, as Paper 47-18/78-S&A of the Central Soil & Water Conserv. Res. & Training Institute, Dehra Dun- 248195, India.

2 Soil Physicist. Now located at Central Soil & Water Conserv. Res. Inst., Agra-282004, India.

Received for publication October 2, 1978. Accepted for publication April 4, 1979.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1979 by the Soil Science Society of America.