SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:827-834 (1979)
© 1979 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dirksen, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dirksen, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dirksen, C.

Flux-Controlled Sorptivity Measurements to Determine Soil Hydraulic Property Functions1

C. Dirksen2

ABSTRACT

Using a new method, the hydraulic diffusivity and conductivity functions D[{theta}] and K[h] can be determined over most of their range in about 4 hours. This method uses a series of fast and simple, one-dimensional adsorption measurements for which the cumulative volumes of absorption are controlled proportional to the square root of time with syringes driven by cames. Each combination of motor speed, can size, and syringe size represents an imposed sorptivity for which the water content and/or pressure head at the interface must be measured after they become steady. Steady values are normally reached after only a few minutes. Pressure heads can be recorded during the absorption runs, and at the end a soil sample for gravimetric water content determination can be obtained in about 15 sec. Hydraulic diffusivity and conductivity functions derived from measured sorptivity functions were obtained for a variety of undisturbed and hand-packed soil columns. They all showed excellent agreement with independent data. The flux-controlled boundary resulted in uniform wetting almost every time, whereas previously used potential-controlled boundary conditions often caused nonuniform wetting, which prevented accurate evaluation of sorptivities. The speed, range, and accuracy of this improved version of the sorptivity method compare favorably with other available methods. The method is suitable for routine and large scale use.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the U. S. Salinity Laboratory, USDA, Riverside, Calif.

2 Soil Scientist, Present address: Department of Soils and Fertilizers, Agricultural State University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Received for publication January 19, 1979. Accepted for publication April 18, 1979.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
H. Fujimaki, H. Fujimaki, and M. Inoue
A Transient Evaporation Method for Determining Soil Hydraulic Properties at Low Pressure
Vadose Zone J., August 1, 2003; 2(3): 400 - 408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
H. Fujimaki, H. Fujimaki, and M. Inoue
Reevaluation of the Multistep Outflow Method for Determining Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity
Vadose Zone J., August 1, 2003; 2(3): 409 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1979 by the Soil Science Society of America.