SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:1067-1073 (1979)
© 1979 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mualem, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, E. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mualem, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, E. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mualem, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, E. E.

A Hysteresis Model Based on an Explicit Domain-Dependence Function1

Y. Mualem and E. E. Miller2

ABSTRACT

A quantitative model of hysteresis is proposed, assuming the pore-water blockage against air entry to be a direct function of the volume of pore domains located in the completely-filled region of the state diagram. The relative volume of the porewater domains {theta}o, evaluated from the history of the capillary head {psi} assuming the domains are independent, is employed in a dependency correction function P*d({theta}o). For calibration, this model requires only the main loop of hysteresis and one drying scanning curve. The merit of this "Model IIIexpl" compared with Model III (Y. Mualem, 1974b, Y. Mualem and G. Dagan, 1975) is that any hysteretic process of wetting and drying is expressed analytically in explicit form. This property simplifies the computational procedure and saves computer time in practical application.

The overall agreement between predicted and measured hysteretic behavior is acceptable. However, the study reveals that in the range of the air entry value the model does not reproduce the main drying curve accurately if it diverges considerably from the drying scanning curve. This deficiency may reflect the less physical ground for Model IIIexpl compared to the implicit Model III.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Hydrology and Water Resource Program, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Colo. State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523. Supported by funds provided by the National Science Foundation under Grant ENG7800845.

2 Research Associate Professor, Colorado State University, and Professor, University of Wisconsin-Madison, respectively.

Received for publication December 4, 1978. Accepted for publication June 30, 1979.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
A. Poulovassilis and G. Kargas
A Note on Calculating Hysteretic Behavior
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2000; 64(6): 1947 - 1950.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1979 by the Soil Science Society of America.