SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:1184-1188 (1979)
© 1979 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Craswell, E. T.
Right arrow Articles by Vlek, P. L. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Craswell, E. T.
Right arrow Articles by Vlek, P. L. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Craswell, E. T.
Right arrow Articles by Vlek, P. L. G.

Greenhouse Evaluation of Nitrogen Fertilizers for Rice1

E. T. Craswell and P. L. G. Vlek2

ABSTRACT

As part of a research program to improve the efficiency of N fertilizers for lowland rice (Oryza sativa, L. var. IR38) in developing countries, a number of modified urea products have been evaluated in a greenhouse experiment. Fertilizers were applied to rice grown in two soils subjected to continuous or intermittent flooding. The results demonstrate the advantages of split application, deep placement, and controlled release in increasing fertilizer efficiency. However, the major finding was that a combination of deep placement and controlled release results in a substantial increase in fertilizer N recovery by the plant. This combination, in the form of sulfur-coated supergranules of urea, gave a mean apparent recovery of fertilizer N by rice of approximately 84% compared with only 28% for urea applied in a single dose at transplanting.

By using 15N-labelling, losses of applied N were measured for selected treatments. Extensive losses (~30% for Decatur soil, ~50% for Crowley soil) were measured for urea applied at transplanting. Much less (~6% and 14–24%, respectively) was lost of ammonium sulfate applied similarly. Point application of the urea as a supergranule at the 8-cm depth reduced losses to < 4%. The intermittent flooding did not promote losses. Losses of broadcast fertilizers were greater from the Crowley soil (pH 6.2) than from the Decatur soil (pH 5.0).


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Agro-Economic Division of the International Fertilizer Development Center (IFDC), Muscle Shoals, Alabama 35660.

2 Soil Scientists.

Received for publication March 14, 1979. Accepted for publication June 27, 1979.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1979 by the Soil Science Society of America.