SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:445-450 (1980)
© 1980 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jury, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Farmer, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jury, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Farmer, W. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jury, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Farmer, W. J.

Modeling Vapor Losses of Soil-Incorporated Triallate1

W. A. Jury2, R. Grover3, W. F. Spencer4 and W. J. Farmer2

ABSTRACT

Vapor losses of triallate [S-(2,3,3-trichloroallyl) diisopropylthiocarbamate] incorporated into two soils with widely different organic matter contents were measured in the absence and presence of evaporating water. Adsorption isotherms (relating triallate solution concentrations to adsorbed triallate) were used to compare predicted and measured transport of triallate by mass flow and diffusion. With San Joaquin sandy loam, volatilization rate was greater when water was evaporating than when evaporation was suppressed but with Flanagan silt loam packed to a much lower bulk density, vapor loss was nearly the same in the presence and absence of evaporation. Total vapor losses during the 29- or 30-day, period were 2.97 and 3.76% of the amounts applied from San Joaquin sandy loam and 3.72 and 3.80% from Flanagan silt loam without and with evaporation, respectively. Good agreement was observed between the total measured triallate vapor flux with evaporation and the convective mass flux calculated from the product of the solution concentration below the surface times the water evaporation flux.


NOTES

1 Contribution of Agricultural Research, SEA, USDA, and the California Agric. Exp. Stn., Riverside, Calif.

2 Associate Professor, Dep. of Soil and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Calif., Riverside CA 92521.

3 Visiting Research Scientist, Dep. of Soil and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Calif., Riverside, CA 92521. Present address is Research Station, Agriculture Canada, Regina, Saskatchewan.

4 Soil Scientist, USDA-SEA, Riverside, CA 92521.

Received for publication September 10, 1979. Accepted for publication January 9, 1980.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1980 by the Soil Science Society of America.