SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:450-457 (1980)
© 1980 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larson, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Useche, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Larson, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Useche, R. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Larson, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Useche, R. A.

Compression of Agricultural Soils from Eight Soil Orders1

W. E. Larson, S. C. Gupta and R. A. Useche2

ABSTRACT

Compression curves (bulk density vs. log applied stress) determined on 36 world agricultural soil samples at a given water content were linear over the range of stresses from about 1 to 10 kg cm–2. Compression curves determined for soils at different water contents were approximately parallel to each other over the range of initial pore water potentials from –0.05 to –1.0 bar. The compression index, C (slope of the compression curve), increased approximately linearly as clay content of the soil increased up to about 33% and then remained approximately constant as clay content further increased. The maximum C value was 0.55 for soils with predominantly 2:1 type clays and 0.50 for soils with predominantly kaolinite or iron oxides in the clay fraction. If the compression curve at one water content is known, a procedure is suggested to predict compression curves at other water contents.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Soil and Water Management Research Unit, Science and Education Administration — Agric. Research. USDA, St. Paul, Minn., in cooperation with the Minnesota Agric. Exp. Stn., Paper no. 10,586, Sci. Journal Series.

2 Soil Scientist, USDA, SEA-AR, and Professor, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota; Soil Scientist, USDA, SEA-AR, St. Paul, Minnesota; and former Graduate Student, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.

Received for publication April 18, 1979. Accepted for publication August 15, 1979.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
Y. Zhao, M. Krzic, C. E. Bulmer, and M. G. Schmidt
Maximum Bulk Density of British Columbia Forest Soils from the Proctor Test: Relationships with Selected Physical and Chemical Properties
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 25, 2008; 72(2): 442 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
S. Imhoff, A. P. Da Silva, and D. Fallow
Susceptibility to Compaction, Load Support Capacity, and Soil Compressibility of Hapludox
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2004; 68(1): 17 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
R. A. Wesley, C. D. Elmore, and S. R. Spurlock
Deep Tillage and Crop Rotation Effects on Cotton, Soybean, and Grain Sorghum on Clayey Soils
Agron. J., January 1, 2001; 93(1): 170 - 178.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1980 by the Soil Science Society of America.