SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:697-702 (1980)
© 1980 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Russo, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bresler, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Russo, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bresler, E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Russo, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bresler, E.

Field Determinations of Soil Hydraulic Properties for Statistical Analyses1

David Russo and Eshel Bresler2

ABSTRACT

A procedure for repetitive determinations of soil hydraulic properties is based on the assumption that the functional relationships between soil water content ({theta}) and soil water pressure head (h), and between the hydraulic conductivity (K) and h, can be expressed mathematically. The parameters in the mathematical expression are: saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) and water content ({theta}s), residual (or irreducible) water content ({theta}r), water entry value of h (hw), and the parameters {eta} and ß, characterizing the pore size distribution of the soil. Values of Ks and hw are measured by the air-entry permeameter of H. Bouwer. The parameters {eta} and ß were calculated with measured values of Ks, hw, {theta}s, {theta}r, and the sorptivity, S, as measured by C. Dirksen's method. The variability in the determination of the K({theta}) function is evaluated in the field, from 30 measurements of each of the six parameters made in a single 2 by 2 m site. This variability is smaller than the variability of K({theta}) as calculated from a simulation of a transient drainage. The K(h) and {theta}(h) functions are rapidly obtained and thus suitable for performing large numbers of measurements for the determination of the probability density functions (and joint probability density functions) of the soil hydraulic conductivity, K({theta}), and soil water retentivity, h({theta}), functions.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel. no. 171-E, 1979 series.

2 Graduate Research Assistant and Soil Physicist, respectively, Division of Soil Physics, ARO, Bet Dagan, Israel.

Received for publication May 30, 1979. Accepted for publication February 20, 1980.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
D. Russo
Stochastic Analysis of Solute Mass Flux in Gravity-Dominated Flow through Bimodal Heterogeneous Unsaturated Formations
Vadose Zone J., September 12, 2005; 4(4): 939 - 953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1980 by the Soil Science Society of America.