SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:903-907 (1980)
© 1980 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jaynes, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Tyler, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jaynes, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Tyler, E. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jaynes, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Tyler, E. J.

Comparison of One-step Outflow Laboratory Method to an in situ Method for Measuring Hydraulic Conductivity1

D. B. Jaynes and E. J. Tyler2

ABSTRACT

The unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, K, of three soil horizons; the C horizon of a Plainfield sand (Typic Udipsamment), the C horizon of a Ringwood silt loam (Typic Argiudoll), and the B2t horizon of a Plano silt loam (Typic Argiudoll) was measured using a variation of the one-step porous membrane outflow method. The method was adapted for measuring K using small (7.65 cm high by 7.65 cm in diam) undisturbed soil cores at soil water pressure potentials > –100 mbars. Comparison of these K values with values previously measured in situ for the same horizons with the crust test agreed within an order of magnitude or less. The discrepancy was probably due to hysteresis in the {theta}-{psi} relation.

The one-step outflow method yields satisfactory results near saturation but cannot be used to measure saturated K values. Compared to other methods, the one-step outflow procedure requires less time to measure K for many types of soils and facilititates the running of many samples simultaneously.


NOTES

1 Contribution of the Geological and Natural History Survey and the Dep. of Soil Science, Univ. of Wis. Research supported by the Geological and Natural History Survey, Univ. of Wis.-Extension and the Small Scale Waste Management Project, College of Agric. and Life Sciences, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison.

2 Former Specialist, Univ. of Wis., presently Graduate Assistant, Northeast Watershed Research Center, USDA-SEA-AR and Dep. of Agronomy, The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802; and Assistant Professor of Soil Science, Geological and Natural History Survey and Dep. of Soil Science, Univ. of Wis.-Extension and the Univ. of Wis.-Madison, WI 53706.

Received for publication June 18, 1979. Accepted for publication May 26, 1980.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1980 by the Soil Science Society of America.