SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:149-155 (1982)
© 1982 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Denmead, O. T.
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Denmead, O. T.
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, J. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Denmead, O. T.
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, J. R.

Dynamics of Ammonia Volatilization during Furrow Irrigation of Maize1

O. T. Denmead, J. R. Freney and J. R. Simpson2

ABSTRACT

In irrigated agriculture, supplemental nitrogen (N) is commonly applied by dissolving ammonia (NH3) gas in the irrigation water. The operation is convenient and labor-saving, but because NH3 is volatile, the potential for loss is high.

A micrometeorological method was used to measure losses of NH3 gas during applications of water-run NH3 to short (0.9 m) and tall (2.1 m) maize crops. The equilibrium NH3 vapor pressure of the irrigation water and wind speed both affected the loss, but the influence of the latter was very marked, volatilization increasing with the approximate square of the wind speed.

Average volatilization losses were 7% of the N present in the irrigation water per hour from the short crop, and 1% from the tall crop, the difference arising from the greater attenuation of wind in the tall crop. Results for both crops were reconciled by considering transfer through an air layer close to the ground. Volatilization rate could then be expressed as the product of a wind-dependent exchange coefficient and the NH3 vapor pressure difference between the water surface and 0.3 m.

Volatilization losses resulted in very uneven applications of N. The nitrogen content of the irrigation water decreased by 84% over a distance of 400 m along the furrow in the short crop, and by 59% in the tall crop. Some practical remedies are suggested, including irrigating at night. In these experiments, night-time volatilization rates were only one-half those observed by day for similar aqueous NH3 concentrations.

Key Words: nitrogen loss • fertilizer efficiency • vapor transfer.


NOTES

1 Contribution from CSIRO, Australia.

2 Senior Principal Research Scientists, CSIRO Divisions of Environmental Mechanics, P.O. Box 821, Canberra City, A.C.T. 2601, and Plant Industry, P.O. Box 1600, Canberra City, A.C.T. 2601, Australia.

Received for publication January 26, 1981. Accepted for publication August 21, 1981.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
R. R. Sherlock, S. G. Sommer, R. Z. Khan, C. W. Wood, E. A. Guertal, J. R. Freney, C. O. Dawson, and K. C. Cameron
Ammonia, Methane, and Nitrous Oxide Emission from Pig Slurry Applied to a Pasture in New Zealand
J. Environ. Qual., September 1, 2002; 31(5): 1491 - 1501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
A. O. LANGFORD and F. C. FEHSENFELD
Natural Vegetation as a Source or Sink for Atmospheric Ammonia: A Case Study
Science, January 31, 1992; 255(5044): 581 - 583.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1982 by the Soil Science Society of America.