SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:158-161 (1982)
© 1982 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bauder, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Randall, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bauder, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Randall, G. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bauder, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Randall, G. W.

Regression Models for Predicting Corn Yields from Climatic Data and Management Practices1

J. W. Bauder and G. W. Randall2

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between climatic factors, management-controlled factors, and corn (Zea mays L.) grain yield in the northern Corn Belt. Harvest grain moisture and early plant growth were also investigated. Models were developed to quantify the effect of variations in seasonal climatic conditions and annual management practices on corn grain yield. The study was conducted on Webster clay loam, a fine-loamy, mixed mesic Typic Haplaquoll in south-central Minnesota.

Soil-stored moisture and early and mid-season precipitation were significantly related to corn grain yield. Other inputs included date of planting, final populations, and previous crop residue on the soil surface at planting time. The models accounted for 86 to 89% of the variability in corn grain yield and 93% of the variability in grain moisture percentage over a 5-year period, where five different tillage practices were compared. The models provide a simplistic means of identifying and demonstrating the significance of management practices that maximize yields. They also provided a means of approximating grain yield potential.

Key Words: yield model • available water • tillage model • weather • population • planting date


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Dep. of Soil Science, Univ. of Minnesota Agric. Exp. Stn., St. Paul, as Journal Series no. 11,615. Received 6 Mar. 1981. Approved 21 Sept. 1981.

2 Former Associate Professor, Univ. of Minnesota, Now Extension Soil Scientist, Montana State Univ.; and Soil Scientist, Southern Exp. Stn., Univ. of Minnesota, Waseca, respectively.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
N. E. Derby, F. X. M. Casey, R. E. Knighton, and D. D. Steele
Midseason Nitrogen Fertility Management for Corn Based on Weather and Yield Prediction
Agron. J., March 1, 2004; 96(2): 494 - 501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1982 by the Soil Science Society of America.