SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:228-230 (1982)
© 1982 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chong, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ahuja, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chong, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ahuja, L. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chong, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ahuja, L. R.

Determination of Sorptivity based on In-situ Soil Water Redistribution Measurements1

S. K. Chong, R. E. Green and L. R. Ahuja2

ABSTRACT

A simple, physically based algebraic equation is derived for calculating sorptivity as a function of antecedent soil water content. The wetting front matric pressure head, Hf, determined from the field profile redistribution data in a previous study, is utilized in an equation which gives sorptivity, S, as a function of fillable porosity, i.e., the difference between the satiated and antecedent soil water content, ({theta}s{theta}i), satiated hydraulic conductivity, Ks, and wetting front matric pressure head, Hf, namely, S2 = –2({theta}s{theta}i)KsHf. The final equation gives S explicitly as a function of antecedent water content, {theta}i, with {theta}s and Ks being constants for a given soil. The calculated sorptivity is assessed by its use in the Talsma-Parlange infiltration equation and subsequent comparison of predicted and measured infiltration. The method was tested on seven different sites with 14 infiltration measurements on Oxisol soils of Hawaii. The percentage error between predicted and measured cumulative infiltration ranged from 2.1% to 51.9%, with an average error of 21.8% for the 14 comparisons.


NOTES

1 Contribution from Dep. of Forestry, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901.

2 Assistant Professor, Dep. of Forestry, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901; Professor, Dep. of Agronomy and Soil Science, University of Hawaii; and Research Soil Physicist, USDA Water Quality Management Laboratory, Durant, Okla., respectively.

Received for publication February 3, 1981. Accepted for publication October 21, 1981.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1982 by the Soil Science Society of America.