SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:276-279 (1982)
© 1982 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Onken, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Matheson, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Onken, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Matheson, R. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Onken, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Matheson, R. L.

Dissolution Rate of EDTA-extractable Phosphate from Soils1

A. B. Onken and R. L. Matheson2

ABSTRACT

The kinetics of phosphorus (P) dissolution in EDTA (ethylenedi-aminetetraacetic acid) solution were investigated for several soils for the purpose of determining if the dissolution rate constants could be related to crop response to applied P. Eight kinetic models were evaluated using coefficients of determination (R2) and standard errors of estimate (SE). Additionally, the effects of temperature and soil-solution ratio on P dissolution in the EDTA solution were determined.

Relatively high values of R2 and low values of SE indicated that P dissolution in EDTA solution for the soils used was most often best described by the two-constant rate equation, the Elovich-type equation, and the differential rate equation. None of the models best described the dissolution for all soils. Using R2 and SE for evaluation, the best relationships found between dissolution rate constants and yield response to applied P were for the two-constant rate equation (R2 = 0.97; SE = 2.58) and the differential rate equation (R2 = 0.95; SE = 2.69). Soil-solution ratio affected the values of dissolution rate constants, with those obtained from the differential rate equation most sensitive. The Arrhenius equation described reasonably well the effect of temperature on values of the dissolution rate constants.


NOTES

1 Technical contribution no. 17,160, Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Texas A&M Univ. Agric. Res. and Ext. Center, Route 3, Lubbock, TX 79401. All programs and information of the Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. are available without regard to race, ethnic origin, religion, sex, or age.

2 Professor and Research Associate, respectively, Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Texas A&M Univ. Agric. Res. and Ext. Center, Lubbock, TX 79401.

Received for publication September 9, 1981. Accepted for publication November 24, 1981.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
M. Quaghebeur, A. Rate, Z. Rengel, and C. Hinz
Desorption Kinetics of Arsenate from Kaolinite as Influenced by pH
J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2005; 34(2): 479 - 486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
U. K. Saha, C. Liu, L. M. Kozak, and P. M. Huang
Kinetics of Selenite Adsorption on Hydroxyaluminum- and Hydroxyaluminosilicate-Montmorillonite Complexes
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2004; 68(4): 1197 - 1209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1982 by the Soil Science Society of America.