SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:323-328 (1982)
© 1982 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adams, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Odom, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Adams, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Odom, J. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Adams, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Odom, J. W.

Interaction of Phosphorus Rates and Soil pH on Soybean Yield and Soil Solution Composition of Two Phosphorus-Sufficient Ultisols1

J. F. Adams, Fred Adams and J. W. Odom2

ABSTRACT

Because growers continue to use phosphorus (P) fertilizer on soils that test high in available P, two field experiments were conducted to determine what nutritional problem, if any, would develop in soybeans (Glycine max L.) when high levels of P were established on Ultisols. Soil pH levels, ranging from 5.0 to > 7.0, were established by differential limiting; five P rates as concentrated superphosphate were superimposed on the pH levels. Zinc (Zn) deficiency was induced by high P rates and high pH, and the magnitude of yield reduction corresponded with the intensity of deficiency symptoms on foliage. Leaf Zn, acid-extractable soil Zn, and soil solution Zn were poor indicators of Zn deficiency. The ratio of P/Zn in leaves was a fair indicator in one soil and a poor one in the other, possibly because of differences in availability of subsoil Zn. Soil solution Zn, which ranged between 0.1 and 5.1 µM, was affected by pH but not P level. Soil solution P, which ranged between 5 and 230 µM, was affected primarily by P rates. Both SO4 and Si concentrations in soil solutions were increased by increasing P rates. Calculated ion activity products for Ca5OH(PO4)3 showed numerous soil solutions to be supersaturated with respect to hydroxyapatite.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Dep. of Agronomy & Soils, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849. Published with the approval of the Director of the Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn. as Journal Series no. 3-810071.

2 Research Assistant, Professor, and Assistant Professor, respectively.

Received for publication July 6, 1981. Accepted for publication September 17, 1981.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
S. A. Staggenborg, M. Carignano, and L. Haag
Predicting Soil pH and Buffer pH In Situ with a Real-Time Sensor
Agron. J., May 11, 2007; 99(3): 854 - 861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1982 by the Soil Science Society of America.